Quakers vs Quaker School

April 1, 2011

This morning’s New York Times brings news of a controversy in New York City between Friends Seminary, the excellent, Quaker independent school, and New York Quarterly Meeting, the grouping of Quakers with which the school is affiliated both through governance and through ownership of property. The controversy is an all-too-familiar one surrounding Quaker educational institutions and the Quaker worship bodies with which they are affiliated.

Full disclosure: I’m a former member of the School Committee (board of trustees) of Friends Seminary, and still a current member of 15th Street Meeting, one of the component congregations of New York Quarterly Meeting.  While at a distance and not at all a participant, I do have a foot in both camps.  And I’ve been through these controversies before at Germantown Friends School/Germantown Friends Meeting; Wilmington Friends School/Wilmington Friends Meeting; Haverford College/the Haverford Corporation; and Earlham College/Indiana and Western Yearly Meetings.

The Times article isn’t especially thoughtful about the controversy.  It names some issues that have been in contention, but doesn’t explore that the relationship should be between a church and a school: it doesn’t illuminate how we ought to think about such a relationship.  (Perhaps that’s in the nature of news reporting.)

What makes a school a Quaker school?  Is it having a large number of Quaker students?  Is it having a curricular program that draws from Quaker beliefs and practices?  Is it in having Quaker members of the Faculty?  Is it in having governance arrangements that largely give direction of the school over to Quakers?  Is it in providing a place for Quaker worship?  Etc.

Last year, Earlham changed its relationship to Indiana Yearly Meeting in important ways.  Indiana Yearly Meeting ceased appointing a quarter of our trustees.  Instead, Indiana Yearly Meeting and Earlham (a church and a college) entered into a covenant by which each  made promises to the other about what each would do for the other in a continuing relationship.  For us, I think it is a good statement of what it means to be a Quaker College.  And it re-established the relationship between us on a better ground.


About Doug Bennett

Doug Bennett is Emeritus President and Professor of Politics at Earlham College. He has a wife, Ellen, and two sons, Tommy (born 1984) and Robbie (born 2003).
This entry was posted in Religion in Higher Education. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Quakers vs Quaker School

  1. lizopp says:


    After meeting you at Iowa Yearly Meeting (Conservative)‘s Midyear Meeting (Fourth Month 2013), I went looking for you online and came across your blog.

    Granted, this piece is from 2011 and I remember reading the NYTimes article… Mostly I’m leaving this comment to say I was hoping to read the “covenant” to which you refer, but the link doesn’t work and I wanted you to have ask if you might be able to fix it.

    I hope we find the Way open to stay in touch.

    Liz, The Good Raised Up

  2. Doug Bennett says:

    Liz — Very good to hear from you, and I hope we have more occasions to talk.
    I’ve restored the link to the Covenant, but this link is to a personal copy. There is no longer a link to the Covenant on the Earlham website. Why might that be? Perhaps it is because of the schism that has recently torn apart Indiana Yearly Meeting. (I’ve written a good deal about this schism on my Quaker blog, River View Friend (riverviewfriend.wordpress.com). Or perhaps it is because of a lessened regard t Earlham for its relationship to the Religious Society of Friends. Or perhaps it is simply a goof in maintaining a complex website. I simply do not know.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s